
School Improvement Plan
2011-2012
North Central High School
Submission Date
North Central High
9th12th
P.O. Box 10
Lebeau, La. 71345
Jerome Robinson
Jr5566@slp.k12.la.us
Check where applicable:
Charter School Alternative School School in School ImprovementxTitle I School Schoolwide _____Targeted Assistance
Member of Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Teacher Advancement Program (TAP) Distinguished Educator Literacy and Numeracy Grant Application
2
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN CROSSWALK
Table of Contents for SIP
[Schoolwide Components NCLB Section 1114 (b)(1)(A-J)]
[School Improvement Plan NCLB Section 1116(b)(3)(A)(i-x)]
Each school operating a schoolwide program must include all ten components in their plan. All schoolwide schools in improvement status must include the ten requirements for schools in improvement.
|
Ten Components of a Schoolwide Program |
"Tools" Pages |
Ten Requirements of a School Improvement Plan |
Your SIP Pages |
|
1.A comprehensive needs assessment of the entire school based on information which includes the achievement of children in relation to the State academic content standards and the State student academic achievement standards. |
23 25 |
1. An effective needs assessment |
|
|
2. Schoolwide Reform Strategies |
32 39 |
2. A strategy for school improvement is a method for achieving the identified objectives. (e.g., using graphic organizers, visual imagery, and summarization). Scientifically Based Research (ESEA; Title IX, Part A) is research that involves the application of rigorous, systematic, and objective procedures to obtain reliable and valid knowledge relevant to education activities and programs. |
|
|
3. Instruction by Highly Qualified Teachers |
Rubric, Page 80 |
3. Provide an assurance that the instruction will be provided by highly qualified teachers. In addition, job-embedded professional development will be directed to address the needs of teachers and other staff members in the school to ensure academic achievement problems are identified for improvement. |
|
|
4. High quality and ongoing professional development for
|
45 49 |
4. Effective Professional Development incorporates the following:
|
|
|
5. Strategies to attract high-quality highly qualified teachers to high-need schools |
Attached to School Improvement Plans |
5. Provide a District plan or policy Teacher Quality Strategies (plan for attracting high quality teachers) Identify revision date on School Policy chart, page 15 of SIP. |
|
|
6. Strategies to increase parent involvement (Such as family literacy services) |
50 55 |
6. Effective family involvement: |
|
|
7. Plans for assisting preschool children in the transition from early childhood programs to local elementary school programs. (Such as Head Start, Even Start, Early Reading First, or a State-run preschool program) |
http://www.ed.gov/policy/elsec
/guid/preschoolguidance.pdf |
7. Serving Preschool Children Under Title I Non-Regulatory Guidance: Section B-11.
|
|
|
8. Measures to include teachers in the decisions regarding the use of academic assessments in order to provide information on, and to improve, the achievement of individual students and the overall instructional program. |
Curriculum Section, pages 56 69 Rubric, pages 78 81 |
8. What processes are in place for administrator(s) to identify teachers professional development needs related to content, instructional strategies, and classroom assessment? The SIP must present the actual people who will see the activities have taken place, not only the trainer, model provider, or a group of people, but those who will be responsible for setting them up and ensuring they are completed. |
|
|
9. Activities to ensure that students who experience difficulty mastering proficient or advanced levels of academic achievement standards are provided effective, timely additional assistance which shall include measures to ensure that student difficulties are identified on a timely basis and to provide sufficient information on which to base effective assistance. |
56 69 |
9. The Administration monitors the Taught Curriculum Teacher teams, with the SIT and School Support Team improves the Taught Curriculum |
|
|
10. Coordination and integration of federal, State, and local services and programs
|
70 72 |
10. Effective coordination of resources |
Directions on What to Submit to the LDE and
How to Complete the SIP Template
*Schools submit SIPs to the district for evaluation using the states rubric
Principal Signature: ________________________ Date: _________________________
Superintendents Signature: ________________________ Date: _________________________
TABLE OF CONTENTS
<The page numbers for each component will change as information is added.>
DATA PORTFOLIO
DISTRICT ASSURANCE
FEDERAL/STATE INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAMS AND/OR INITIATIVES
SCHOOL POLICIES AND PARTNERSHIPS .
DATA TRIANGULATION SHEETS ..
DATA COMPREHENSIVE NEEDS ASSESSMENT: SUMMARY REPORT .
TOTAL SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET FOR RESTRICTED AND DISCRETIONARY FUNDS ..
DATA PORTFOLIO
The following items should make up the Data Portfolio (to be kept on file at the school):
DISTRICT ASSURANCE
|
__________________________________________________ Superintendent's signature |
_____________________________________________________ Principal's signature |
|
__________________________________________________ District Assistance or School Support Team Leader |
_____________________________________________________ Chair, School Improvement Team |
FEDERAL/STATE INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAMS AND/OR INITIATIVES
(Place a check or X in the status area for each program implemented at your school)
|
Program List: (including during- and after-school programs) |
Currently Using |
No. of Years |
Proposed Program |
Deleted Program |
|
Career to Work |
x |
|||
|
Extended Day Program |
x |
|||
|
HIPPY |
n/a |
|||
|
INTECH |
x |
6 |
||
|
INTECH 2 Science |
||||
|
INTECH Social Studies |
||||
|
La GEAR-UP |
||||
|
LaSIP |
||||
|
LEAD TECH |
||||
|
Math/Science Partnership |
||||
|
Pre-School Program (s) |
n/a |
|||
|
School-to-Work |
x |
4 |
||
|
The Strategic Instruction Model (SIM) |
||||
|
Other: Plato Learning System |
x |
5 |
||
|
List Supplemental Educational Services provided for your students (Title I schools in SI 3 and above): |
|
List the Distance Learning (i.e., web-based, satellite) courses provided for your students:
|
SCHOOL POLICIES AND PARTNERSHIPS
|
Policy |
Policy #/Bulletin # |
Date revised |
Copy on file at school? |
|
|
Crisis Management (emergency/evacuation plan) |
§ 339/741 |
09-29-10 |
x Yes |
No |
|
Discipline/Behavior Plan (Juvenile Justice Reform Act requirement) |
§ 1301/741 and § 1127/741 |
06/20/08 |
x Yes |
No |
|
Family Involvement Policy |
§ 1903/741 and § 1118/Title I |
09/02/08 |
x Yes |
No |
|
Security Procedures (metal detectors, etc.) |
§ 339/741 |
08/20/08 |
x Yes |
No |
|
Safe and Drug-Free Prevention Activities |
§ 1127/741 and § 2305/741 |
10/20/08 |
x Yes |
No |
|
Student Code of Conduct |
§ 1115/741 |
08/09/10 |
x Yes |
No |
|
Teacher Quality Strategies (plan for attracting high quality teachers) |
§ 1114/Title I |
Yes | No | |
|
Transition Plan for Pre-School Children |
§ 1114/Title I |
Yes | No | |
|
School Partnerships (Type the name of each partner in the space provided) |
|
|
University |
Northwestern University , ULL |
|
Technical Institute |
T.H. Harris |
|
Feeder School(s) |
Palmetto Elementary |
|
Community |
Palmetto, Morrow, Melville, Morrow, Lebeau, Beggs ,and Washington. |
|
Business/Industry |
Stellys Store, Buddens Store, Cannatellas, LA. Hardwood Production |
|
Private Grants |
QSM,DonorsChoose.org |
|
Other |
|
Data Triangulation Strengths :
|
Strength: Math73.2 Index Score |
||||
|
Contributing Factors (200 characters) |
Domains/Sub domains |
Instrument (200 characters) |
Data Type |
Findings* (500 characters) |
|
Contributing Factor: Highly qualified instructors. .Differentiated instructions. |
Domain: 500 Sub domain: 510 210 |
Academic Review, CRT Analysis |
1. Teacher was highly qualified and motivated. 2. More technology introduced into the classroom 3. Teacher had high expectations of students 4. Students were motivated to "learn". |
|
|
Strength: 10th Math 58.3 % African American |
||||
|
Contributing Factor: Differentiated instructions. 8th period Remediation Program. Job embedded collaborative planning time is dedicated. |
Domain: 200 Sub domain: 220 510 |
CRT Analysis, Classroom Observations |
1. Different instructional strategies. 2. Attendance higher in this group. 3. Teachers working together at this level. 4. Teachers using data information. |
|
|
Strength: 10th grade ED scored 55.6% |
||||
|
Contributing Factor: Differentiated instructions 8th period Remediation Program. Job embedded Collaborative planning time is dedicated.
|
Domain: 200 Sub domain: 220 510 |
Classroom Observations, Academic Review
|
1. Different instructional strategies. 2. Better than average attendance rate. 3. Teachers working together to achieve success. 4. Teachers using data information. |
|
*Must list at least three findings to justify Contributing Factors
Refer to Louisiana Needs Analysis (LANA) page 50 Table 52 Domain and Sub domain codes
Data Triangulation Weaknesses
|
Weakness: 67.9 Index ELA 10th Grade |
||||
|
Contributing Factors (200 characters) |
Domains/Sub domains |
Instrument (200 characters) |
Data Type |
Findings* (500 characters) |
|
Contributing Factor: Lowest performing group in 9th Grade I Leap. ED subgroup scored below 50% proficiency.Highest disciplinary problems. |
Domain: 100 Sub domain: 130 140 |
Faculty Need Assessment, Contextual observation |
Behavior |
1. Lack of writing skills. 2. School attendance rate lowest in this grade level. 3. Students had highly motivated. 4. Lack of parental support. |
|
Weakness: 48% 10th Grade ELA African American |
||||
|
Contributing Factor: Weak writing skills. Lack of motivation among students. Students have highest absentees. |
Domain: Sub domain: 130 140 810 |
State attendance index, LANA( lack of family support |
Behavior |
1. School attendance lowest in this subgroup. 2. Lack of parental support. 3. .Highest dropout rate. 4. Least motivated. |
|
Weakness: 46.4 %Proficiency ELA |
||||
|
Contributing Fact : Lack of motivation L ow expectation from students. Lack of Technology. |
Domain: 100 Sub domain: 130 140 810 |
LANA(lack of family support) State attendance index. |
Behavior |
1. Lack of parental support. 2. Staffing issues. 3. High absentees across these levels. 4. Economic conditions a factor in low expectations of students |
*Must list at least three findings to justify Contributing Factors
Refer to Louisiana Needs Analysis (LANA) page 50 Table 52 Domain and Sub domain codes
DATA COMPREHENSIVE NEEDS ASSESSMENT: SUMMARY REPORT
For Title I Schools: ELA and Math by subgroups should be primary when considering weaknesses that will lead to the goals in the SIP.
Part Ia: Rank-order the identified areas of strength (3-5) from the student performance (cognitive data), behavior, attendance, dropout
data, and/or graduation index and indicate the supporting data sources:
|
STRENGTHS (100 characters per box) |
DATA SOURCE (100 characters per box) |
|
Trend data Calculator (CRT Scores) |
|
|
Trend data Calculator (CRT Scores) |
|
|
Cognitive Data |
|
4. Highly qualified Instructor |
Faculty Needs Assessment |
|
5. Highly Motivated students, |
Cognitive Data |
Part IIa. List the contributing factors from the cognitive, attitudinal/perceptual, behavioral, and archival data of the previously identified
Strengths:
|
CONTRIBUTING FACTORS TO THE STRENGTHS (100 characters per box) |
DATA SOURCE (100 characters per box) |
|
1 Black student scored higher which reflected in the index score. |
Trend Data Calculator (CRT Scores) |
|
2. Ed Subgroup scored over 50% Proficiency |
Trend Data Calculator (CRT Score) |
|
3 Students were more motivated. |
Faculty Needs Assessment. |
|
4 ED Subgroup scored over 50 % Proficiency. |
Faculty Needs Assessment |
|
5. More technology introduced into classroom. |
Faculty Needs Assessment |
DATA COMPREHENSIVE NEEDS ASSESSMENT: SUMMARY REPORT
Part Ib: Rank-order the identified areas of weakness (3-5) from the student performance (cognitive data), behavior, attendance, dropout data, and/or graduation index and indicate the supporting data sources:
|
WEAKNESSES (100 characters per box) |
DATA SOURCE (100 characters per box) |
|
Trend Data Calculator ( CRT) |
|
|
Trend Data Calculator (CRT) |
|
|
Cognitive Data |
|
|
Attendance Report |
|
5. Highest Dropout rate |
Dropout Data |
Part IIb. List the contributing factors from the cognitive, attitudinal/perceptual, behavioral, and archival data of the previously identified weaknesses:
|
CONTRIBUTING FACTORS TO THE WEAKNESSES (100 characters per box) |
DATA SOURCE (100 characters per box) |
|
1. Writing Skills reflect weaknesses. |
Cognitive Data |
|
2 Low Scores from I Leap 9th Grade. |
Cognitive Data |
|
3. High Referrals |
Behavioral Records |
|
4. Lack of Motivation / |
Behavioral Report. |
|
5. Lack of Parental Involvement |
Archival Data |
The identified weaknesses will lead to the goals. The contributing factors of the weaknesses will lead to the strategies.
Action Plan -
Activities indicated should address all subgroups|
GOAL 1 |
By 2013-2014 students will reach higher standards , attaining proficiency or better in reading /language arts . |
|||||||||
|
Research-Based Strategy 1: RTI JEPD DDD xMEL CA SIM UDL |
||||||||||
|
Provide an explanation for not selecting one of the three recommended strategies:based on present test results and students need MEL is best suited to achieve our goals and objectives. |
||||||||||
|
Indicator of Implementation (250 Characters): (250 Characters) : Up to 6 |
Procedures for Evaluating Indicators of Implementation (250 Characters): Up to 6 |
|||||||||
|
1.1 Vision of Engaged Learning |
1.1 Students are self regulated , able to define learning goals and evaluate their learning in a collaborative setting. |
|||||||||
|
1.2 Students role for Engaged Learning |
1.2 Apprenticeship takes place when students observe and apply the thinking processes used by practitioners. |
|||||||||
|
1.3 Grouping for Engaged Learning |
1.3 Students should become more motivated. Evaluation will be based on test results and changes in learning behavior. |
|||||||||
|
OBJECTIVES: Up to 3 |
DESIRED OUTCOMES: |
|||||||||
|
1.1 |
Increase index from 67.9 to 85.7 by year 2012 for the 10th.grade
|
To improve students performances .To rise the School performance test score. To enhance the students probability of graduating. |
||||||||
|
1.2 |
Increase Proficiency score for African Am from 45.8 to 51.3 by year 2012 10th Grade ELA
|
By achieving the desired outcome it would the rise expectation level , motivate lowest achieving subgroup . Positive outcome could self motivate students to buy into MEL. |
||||||||
|
1.3 |
Increase Proficiency score for ED from 48.1 to 53.3 by year 2012. |
Enhance the graduation rate for subgroup that has the highest dropout rate. Outcome would rise School Performance Scores. |
||||||||
|
Activity (500 Characters) |
Responsible Person (100 Characters) |
Start Date |
Completion Date |
Estimated Cost |
Funding Source |
|||||
|
Initial : Teachers will implement " Writing Across the Curriculum" in all subject areas as means of improving Writing Skills and proper noun/verb usage. |
Ms. Bob ELA Instructor |
Aug-15-11 |
May-22-12 |
0 |
Title One |
|||||
|
Follow up: Teachers will follow up with "Frame Routine" which will enhance writing skills and promote better organization with the thought and writing process. |
Ms Bob ELA Instructor |
2nd six week Sept 23-11 |
May -22 2012 |
-0- |
||||||
|
Job Embedded:Teachers will do a Cross Visit to several schools in the District that has exhibited higher test scores. Teacher will gather information from observation and present to faculty. |
Ms Bob Lavergne ELA Instructor |
Dec 7-11 |
Dec 7-11 |
100.00 |
Title One |
|||||
|
Implementation: Teachers will implement the knowledge and skill gained in MEL and actively engaged students in learning activities and project that results in students more energized in the learning and higher achievement. |
Faculty |
Aug -15-11 |
May 22,12 |
0 |
Title One |
|||||
|
Implementation: 10thGrade Subgroup will receive interventions through 8th period remediation. |
ELA Department Ms. Lavergne / Ms Bob |
Jan/10/12 |
Apr 4th-2012 |
0 |
Title |
|||||
|
Trend Chambers Linda Haynes |
Sept 26,2011 |
Jan 09th 2012 |
0 |
Title one |
|||||
|
Family Involvement ( Communication) Two way communication Newsletters, phone calls. Parents not in attendance will receive same material and guidance to help their children. |
Mrs. Trenda Chambers / |
Nov-10-11 |
Apr-13-12 |
0 |
Title one |
|||||
|
Summative Evaluation (250 Characters): The students performance results of the 2011 state assessments. (EOC, GEE) as well as their exit outcome will be compared to the same outcome of the 2010 the state assessments to determine students academic growth and overall improvement. |
||||||||||
|
Implementation Issues (250 Characters) |
Date Presented |
Resolution(s) (250 Characters) |
Date Resolved |
|||||||
|
NCHS has been experiencing a high dropout rate. Absentees among failing students. |
8/ 12/11 |
The Administration will need to address the issues and concerns that are generating these factors. |
On going |
|||||||
FCI-Indicates Family Community Involvement Activities
D-Indicates Discipline Support Activities
C-Indicates Curriculum Activities
L-Indicates Literacy Activities
N-Indicates Numeracy Activities
Action Plan -
Activities indicated should address all subgroups|
GOAL 2 |
2013-14 Students will reach higher standards attaining proficiency in Math. |
|||||||||
|
Research-Based Strategy 1: RTI JEPD DDD xMEL CA SIM UDL |
||||||||||
|
Provide an explanation for not selecting one of the three recommended strategies: |
||||||||||
|
Indicator of Implementation (250 Characters): Up to 6
|
Procedures for Evaluating Indicators of Implementation (250 Characters): Up to 6 |
|||||||||
|
2.1 Vision of Engaged Learning. |
1.1 Students are self regulated, able to define learning goals and evaluate their learning in a collaborative setting. |
|||||||||
|
2.2 Students role for Engaged Learning. |
1.2 Apprenticeship takes place when students observe and apply the thinking processes used by practitioners. |
|||||||||
|
2.3 Grouping for Engaged Learning. |
1.3 Students should become more motivated. Evaluation will be based on test results and changes in learning behavior. |
|||||||||
|
OBJECTIVES: Up to 3 |
DESIRED OUTCOMES: |
|||||||||
|
2.1 |
Increase index 73.2 to 88.8 by year 2012 10th grade
|
To improve students performances .To rise the School performance test score. To enhance the students probability of graduating. |
||||||||
|
2.2 |
Increase ED Proficiency 55.6 to 60.0 % by year 2012 10th grade.
|
By achieving the desired outcome it would the rise expectation level , motivate lowest achieving subgroup . Positive outcome could self motivate students to buy into MEL. |
||||||||
|
2.3 |
Increase Proficiency Score 54.2 to 58.8 % for African Am by year 2012 10 th grade. |
Enhance graduation rate for lowest achieving subgroup in Math. Desired Outcome will evaluate the Schools Performance Scores. |
||||||||
|
OBJECTIVES: Up to 3 |
DESIRED OUTCOMES: |
|||||||||
|
Activity (500 Characters) |
Responsible Person (100 Characters) |
Start Date |
Completion Date |
Estimated Cost |
Funding Source |
|||||
|
Initial : Instructor will use skills and methods acquired at teacher academy. Program is designed to teach discipline and strategies that can used to implement strategies in School Improvement Plan. |
Math Instructor Brandon Castania |
Aug 29,2011 |
May 2,2012 |
0 |
Title One |
|||||
|
Follow up: Instructionalist : Teacher will also implement Writing Across the Curriculum , to improve written responses on EOC test. |
Math Instructor Brandon Castania |
Nov 4th 2010 |
May 10th 2011 |
0 |
||||||
|
Job Embedded:Teachers will do a Cross Visit to several schools in the District that has exhibited higher test scores. Teacher will gather information from observation and present to faculty. |
Math Instructor Brandon Castania |
Nov 12,2011 |
Nov 12 2011 |
0 |
Title One |
|||||
|
Implementation: Teachers will implement the knowledge and skill gained in MEL and actively engaged students in learning activities and project that results in students more energized in the learning and higher achievement, |
Faculty |
Aug 15-2011 |
May 23,2012 |
0 |
Title One |
|||||
|
Implementation: 9th Grade ED subgroup will receive interventions through 8th period remediation. |
Math Department |
Nov 4th 2010 |
Apr 11th 2011 |
0 |
Title One |
|||||
|
Family Involvement: Two Come and Learn Sessions that involve Parents Learning 3 Maths and 1 ELA. Meeting dates 11-8-10 , Jan 10, 2011 , Feb 21,2011 and April 11,2011 |
Trenda Chamber Linda Haynes |
Sept 26-2011 |
Jan09-2012 |
0 |
Title One |
|||||
|
Family Involvement ( Communication) Two way communication Newsletter,phone call. Parents not in attendance will receive same material and guidance to help their children. |
Trenda Chambers Linda Haynes |
Nov.10-2011 |
Apr13-2012 |
0 |
Title One |
|||||
|
Summative Evaluation (250 Characters): |
||||||||||
|
Implementation Issues (250 Characters) |
Date Presented |
Resolution(s) (250 Characters) |
Date Resolved |
|||||||
|
NCHS has been experience a high teacher turnover in the Math Dept over the last several years |
08/12/11 |
The Administration must address the concerns and issues that are generating those turnovers. |
On going |
|||||||
FCI-Indicates Family Community Involvement Activities C-Indicates Curriculum Activities N-Indicates Numeracy Activities
D-Indicates Discipline Support Activities L-Indicates Literacy Activities